Keyword:
Benefits and Pensions Monitor - Latest News Benefits and Pensions Monitor - Archives Benefits and Pensions Monitor - Classifieds Benefits and Pensions Monitor - Events Benefits and Pensions Monitor - Directories Benefits and Pensions Monitor - Subscribe
Inspired - Benefits and Pensions Monitor

Home
News
Archives
Classifieds
Events / Conferences
Directories
Subscribe
Resources
FAQs
Contact Us
Advertise In Monitor
Advertising Links


Browse by Topics

A Conversation With
Administration
Alternative Investment
Consultants
Global Custody
Money Managers
Benefits
Compensation
DB Pensions
DC Pensions
Disability Management
EAFE & Emerging Markets
Executive Compensation
Group Insurance
Healthcare
Investment
Legal
Miscellaneous
Pensions
Retirement Planning
Risk Management
Socially Responsible Investment
Technology

October 2007

Benefits and Pensions Monitor

Claims Payment Audits - Good Plan Governance

Third-party Audit

A third-party audit of the administrator will typically yield more discrepancies and inaccuracies than an administrator’s self-audit. The administrator audits against its own standards and practices – which may not be in agreement with the contract. It is also important to note that an administrator’s compliance with accounting guidelines does not ensure claim payment accuracy standards and quality controls.

Employer sponsored plans are often open to abuse and fraud. Claims may be submitted to your plan by employees and dependents, and by an array of providers (pharmacists, hospitals, paramedical practitioners, dentists). Misuse of plans can come in many forms:

  • Rendering treatment and services not medically required
  • Charging for treatment not performed
  • Excessive billings
  • Drug abuse
  • Altering of service dates to avoid plan maximums

Transactions that take place between the provider and the administrator with little or no participation of the claimant are especially susceptible. Not all administrators provide an Explanation of Benefit (EOB) payment to claimants when payment is assigned to the provider, citing administrative cost as the reason. It is not uncommon for providers of service to have patients sign a blank claim form that the provider later completes or submits electronically with no patient review. The claimant should review an EOB at the time of the claim payment, or should, at a minimum, be provided with a periodic summary to review and advise the administrator of any items, services, or amounts that do not agree with what they received. With electronic claim submissions and direct-from-provider submissions, involving the claimants through receipt of an EOB should be a relatively easy – and a valuable – step in reducing abuse, fraud, and errors.

Appropriate Sampling

A thorough audit includes a review of the claim system, payment practices, and controls as well as a sampling of claims. A thorough sample includes not only a review of electronic claims payment data, but also an audit of an appropriate sampling of hard copy claims. Our audits of hard copy claim samples show that 95 per cent of errors could not have been detected through an electronic review alone. Findings from past audits have included:

  • payment of predetermination submissions as incurred claims
  • duplicate payments
  • lack of adherence to reasonable and customary guidelines
  • coding and payment of ineligible coverage
  • payment beyond the age limitation of the plan
  • system errors in the application of maximums
  • services paid at an incorrect co-insurance level
  • payment to the wrong plan member
  • payment under the wrong service type affecting accumulation toward service maximums
  • non-enforcement of co-ordination of benefit provisions
  • a lack of investigation of ‘red flags’ or suspicious claims

Good plan governance includes knowing how and what is being paid under your benefit program. Plan sponsors, not their administrators, should be making plan design decisions and know that claims are being paid based on plan documentation and that sufficient controls are in place to protect the plan from abuse and fraud. If the day comes to move to a new administrator, sponsors should know how to specify claim payment requirements based on already established practices. This puts them in a position to assure employees that such a move will not significantly impact claim payments or the cost of the plan.

Susan BowyerSusan Bowyer is a principal in the Toronto office of Mercer Health & Benefits.

< previous

Subscribe to Monitor

 

Home / News Alerts / Archives / Classifieds / Events / Directories / Resources / Subscribe / Login / Contact Us
Advertise In Monitor / Advertising Links / FAQs / People / Privacy Policy / Terms of Service / Sitemap

Copyright ©1999 - 2008 Benefits and Pensions Monitor. All rights reserved.
Pension Fund Investment - Employee Benefits Management

Benefits and Pensions Monitor - Contact Us Benefits and Pensions Monitor - Login Benefits and Pensions Monitor logo